DOTT. SANDRO DI MARIO .... CANDIDATO A SINDACO
Friday, May 29, 2009
Friday, May 22, 2009
DR.CARTURAN (sindaco) & I
The out-gooing mayor of Cisterna honours some members of the community before members of the diplomatic corps during the Festa dei popoli 2009
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Prostitution: The Oldest Profession in the World
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d75/80d75b6d430a8b95d7d5761238f84557cde356b1" alt=""
When it comes to sex trafficking, there is a lot of tension among abolitionists over the topic of prostitution. On the extreme ends, some see all prostitution as a form of trafficking while others make a clear distinction between a person who is a prostitute and someone who is a victim of trafficking. There is, of course, a lot of grey area in between. I bring this up though because today I'm feeling a little frustrated with people who make statements such as, "Prostitution is the oldest profession" or "It's been around for centuries," - as if that somehow proves a point or justifies anything in the prostitution vs. trafficking debate (or, the more common debate over whether prostitution should be legalized). I hate it when people point this out - as if it somehow legitimates anything. Just because something has been around for a long time, doesn't mean it's a good thing.
It's hard to say that women 2000+ years ago chose prostitution of their own free will - more likely, they chose it because it was the only option. It was certainly not some grand statement of female empowerment - rather it was a reaction to the social restrictions placed on women at the time. (Now, some might point to various societies where sex was not as taboo or wrapped up in morality as we see it today, and to them I say that we are talking about commercial transactions for sex - and that if someone can point out a society where prostitution was just as valid a decision as any other business endeavor, and garnered just as much respect and inclusion in society without any opportunity costs (such as marriage) that other business endeavors did not have - I'm willing to listen). ANYWAY - fast forward 2000 years and I wonder how much of this has changed - how much of the decision to become a sex worker today is an enthusiastic embracement of one's own sexuality and the desire to express it in a particular manner, and how much of the decisions is a product of circumstances.
In the present day tension, the idea that someone might choose or even be forced to become a sex worker because of certain circumstances is often overlooked. Now, it is true that, at least from a federal law perspective there has to be some sort of force, fraud, or coercion involved for a commercial transaction involving sex to be considered trafficking. What isn't so clear is what those three words mean. For many, there seems to be this idea that they refer to actions of violence - the woman was chained to the bed, or a gun was held to her head, or she was beaten until she finally submitted. Others consider a definition that afford a little more breadth, so that things like deliberate/blatant psychological coercion or manipulation will qualify as trafficking. Absent some egregious factor such as specific and/or severe physical, sexual, or psychological abuse (from a pimp or from her past) though, many people assume that a woman who is a sex worker is doing it of her own volition - she wants to be there, it was her choice, etc. I think though, that other circumstances play an important role in the idea of consent and that there is room in the idea of force, fraud, or coercion for a different interpretation of consent - one that considers background circumstances that may 'force' a woman into prostitution.
Consent in my mind means active and enthusiastic yes. This can include a woman who chooses, of her own accord, to engage in sexual acts for money. I do not deny that some women will and do choose, of their own volition, without any sort of past hardship or lack of opportunity, to become a sex worker - BUT I think the number of women who fit into this category is very, very small. I think that a large number of women who become sex workers are pushed to that decision by other factors in their life, and when you start adding those factors in, the line between consent and force, fraud, or coercion becomes blurry. What about the woman who did not have the opportunity for an education that would provide her with job skills? What about the woman who has kids to take care of but can't find a job that pays enough? What about the woman who grew up in foster care, or in a family environment surrounded by drug abuse, or the one who is just down on her luck? Are these women victims of trafficking, or are they consenting sex workers?
I am not in any way making a moral judgment here. For your purposes and mine, I have no opinion on the morality of sex workers. What I am trying to do is reframe the debate so people stop seeing it as a black and white, good vs bad issue. I'm asking people to look a little deeper, beyond the question of whether a woman should be allowed to choose to sell her body, beyond the question of whether the government has any right to outlaw a person's rights over their own body, and look beyond the apparent consenting adult ethos. Ask yourself what consent really means, and again, are these women victims of trafficking, or are they consenting sex workers?
My answer? I don't know. Maybe this type of circumstance-created sex work doesn't rise to the level of trafficking, but at the same time I hardly think you can view it as enthusiastic consent. I tend to think that many women who are sex workers would not be in that profession if they were given the opportunity for something else (and the idea of a different set of opportunities can go the whole way back to childhood). I also tend to think that the image we see of sex workers - on TV, on news shows that discuss the topic, etc - is a much more glamorous version of what most sex workers experience. I get a sense that the women who go on to news programs to advocate for sex workers (sometimes actual workers, sometimes not) are the exceptions to the rule - maybe even the ones that did have the opportunities others miss. (NB: that was a huge blanket statement there. Please excuse for the sake of the argument).
Now, for a full disclosure that hopefully won't distract from my above point - I don't know what I think about prostitution being legalized either. Some days I favor the idea of legalizing it - because a woman should be able to decide what she does with her body, and even if the only reason she is involved is due to circumstances that forced her there (money issues for example), far be it from me to limit the ways she has to escape those circumstances, or force her into a worse situation because that avenue of income is unavailable. Now, on those days I still favor prosecuting those who create the demand for such services to the maximum possible under the law. I have no time for people who pay for sex - I think it is wrong and pathetic and there is no way you will ever convince me that the payor is not exploiting the payee, even if the payee is a consenting adult. This is one of the few things I will express a judgment on with no reservations or qualifications whatsoever (although the law student in me still feels the need to reserve the right to change that statement, should anyone make a valid argument that convinces me I am wrong). For more on the idea of legalizing prostitution but outlawing the demand side, see Jennifer's post!
Oh - and also - take a moment to think about the phrase, "Prostitution is the oldest profession in history" before you use it to justify present day prostitution. Whether you are for or against the legalization, basing your argument on the reality of a few thousand years ago is just silly.
SOURCE
Friday, May 8, 2009
Guantanamo Libya. The new Italian border police
Guantanamo Libya. The new Italian border police
Nothing strange, says the lawyer Abdussalam Edgaimish. Libyan law does not provide free legal aid for crimes punishable by less than three years. Edgaimish is the director of the Bar of Tripoli. He welcomes us in his office, in the First September road. He explains us that the practice of arrest and detention of immigrants have nor legal basis neither a validation from the court. Any Libyan citizen, according to the law, could not be deprived of liberty without a warrant of arrest. But for foreigners it is not the same. Police raids are usual. The practice is that of house-to-house raids in the suburbs of Tripoli. Mustafa O. Attir think the same. He is professor of sociology in the Tripoli University of El Fatah. "It is not simply a problem of racism. Libyans are kind with foreigners. It is a matter of police." Attir knows what he says. He visited Libyan prisons as a researcher in 1972, 1984 and 1986. Police officers have no education – he tells us - and are instead educated to the concept of punishment. ![]() Read also: Libya: inside the immigrants detention centre of Misratah Border Sahara: the detention centres in the Libyan desert Download the Fortress Europe 2007 Report: Escape from Tripoli |
Speciale Libia: cosa accadrà ai 227 emigranti respinti a Tripoli?
Speciale Libia: cosa accadrà ai 227 emigranti respinti a Tripoli?"Le espulsioni collettive di migranti dall'Italia alla Libia costituiscono una violazione del principio di non refoulement. Le autorità italiane non hanno rispettato i loro obblighi internazionali". Era il 14 aprile del 2005 e il Parlamento Europeo adottava una risoluzione di condanna contro le deportazioni collettive con cui il Governo italiano aveva espulso in Libia 1.500 persone intercettate al largo di Lampedusa tra l'ottobre 2004 e il marzo 2005. "Il parlamento europeo - continuava la risoluzione su Lampedusa P6_TA(2005)0138 - è profondamente preoccupato sul destino di centinaia di richiedenti asilo respinti in Libia, dal momento che questo paese non ha firmato la Convenzione di Ginevra sui rifugiati, non ha un sistema d'asilo, non offre garanzie effettive per i diritti di rifugiati, e pratica arresti arbitrari detenzioni e espulsioni". Un mese dopo, il 10 maggio del 2005, la Corte europea dei diritti umani sospese l'espulsione da Lampedusa di 11 cittadini stranieri sbarcati a marzo e che avevano presentato ricorso. Quattro anni dopo, ciò che ieri era illegale è divenuto regola d'ingaggio dei pattugliamenti di Frontex partiti la settimana scorsa nel Canale di Sicilia. Adesso però le questioni sono due. La prima: che ne sarà del soccorso in mare, quando la priorità non è più la vita dei naufraghi, ma le trattative sul dove portarli? Maroni presenta i 600 salvataggi fatti dalle nostre unità in acque maltesi come un peccato originale. In realtà fanno onore alla nostra Guardia costiera e alla nostra Marina militare. Perchè questa gente non viaggia su navi di crociera. Ma su vecchi legni malmessi. Tutti ricordino che sono quasi 4.000 le vite umane che il mare di Sicilia si è ingoiato negli ultimi dieci anni! Bene, rischiano di morirne altrettanti ora che la nostra Guardia costiera ha ricevuto l'ordine di non intervenire in alto mare, senza autorizzazione del ministero dell'Interno, previa consultazione-scontro con Malta. Ieri è andata bene perché il mare era calmo. Ma col mare in tempesta e onde altre quattro metri, bastano pochi minuti di ritardo a decidere la morte di centinaia di persone. La seconda questione è: che cosa succederà ai migranti respinti in Libia? Sappiamo già che sono stati arrestati e detenuti nel carcere di Tuaisha, a Tripoli, fatta eccezione per una donna ricoverata in ospedale dopo sei giorni trascorsi in mare. Adesso, a seconda delle nazionalità, alcuni saranno rimpatriati in pochi giorni (ad esempio verso Tunisia e Egitto), altri saranno tenuti a marcire nelle carceri libiche per mesi, o per anni. In che condizioni? Lo scriviamo da tre anni. Per l'ennesima volta vi riproponiamo i nostri esclusivi reportage. Nella speranza che la stampa ne faccia buon uso, anziché continuare a leccare le scarpe ai ministri. I nostri reportage Guantanamo Libia. I nuovi gendarmi dell'Italia Frontiera Sahara. I campi di detenzione nel deserto libico Reportage dalla Libia: siamo entrati a Misratah ![]() E poi le nostre inchieste: Libia: arrestati i superstiti del naufragio, sono a Tuaisha "Così le navi di Frontex ci respinsero in Libia" Dall'Unione europea 20 milioni alla Libia contro l'immigrazione Libia: ecco le foto dei campi di detenzione La Libia cerca immigrati in Asia, mentre l'Oim pensa ai rimpatri Libia: ecco il testo dell'accordo segreto con l´Italia Italia-Libia: Berlusconi firma l'accordo. Presto i pattugliamenti Italia - Libia: Prodi firma l'accordo per il pattugliamento congiunto Marocco: le testimonianze degli harragas arrestati in Libia Per testimonianze audio potete scaricare questo file Libia: esclusiva intervista con i rifugiati detenuti a Zawiyah |
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
FESTA DEI POPOLI CISTERNA (2009)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d1ca/5d1ca085b1269fc477984236191581c17289ab2c" alt=""
Sabato 16 maggio si svolgerà in piazza 19 Marzo a Cisterna di Latina la terza edizione della Festa dei Popoli.L'evento giunto alla terza edizione rappresenta un momento ormai atteso per vivere una giornata all'insegna dello scambio e dell'incontro con le forme d'arte delle diverse culture. La festa inizierà alle ore 17,30 e prevede una carrellata di spettacoli musicali e di danza di gruppi locali o stranieri che dimostreranno le caratteristiche e peculiarità dei diversi tipi di musiche e danze, un linguaggio universale che da sempre unisce i diversi popoli.Anche quest'anno danza del ventre, samba e balli caraibici, gruppi peruviani e messicani, ritmi africani e Jambè.Durante la serata si potrànno inoltre gustare gratuitamente alcune pietanze tipiche offerte dalle associazioni che rappresenteranno le diverse culture con cibi, oggetti, costumi tipici delle diverse culture. Inserita nell'evento anche una mostra etnografica "Popoli e arte dal mondo" presso palazzo Caetani da Domenica
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
COMMENTS
SHAITSU
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17c73/17c7399e4237854640aa2572bd676a3b1e29cf16" alt="SHAITSU"
Il massaggio Shiatsu che si effettua tramite la pressione delle dita, dei palmi delle mani e dei piedi e dei gomiti su tutto il corpo, agisce sui punti energetici considerati dall'agopuntura. Stimola la circolazione sanguigna ed il flusso linfatico, agisce sul sistema nervoso allentando la tensione muscolare più profonda, rimuove le tossine dei tessuti, risveglia il sistema ormonale e sollecita la capacità di autoguarigione del corpo.